States Debate Medicaid Expansion
August 15, 2013
A half-dozen states are still trying to decide whether to expand Medicaid
enrollment under the new federal health care law, more than three years after
the law was signed and a year after the Supreme Court gave them an easy way to
opt out, says the Washington Times.
Indiana, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Tennessee (all save
for New Hampshire are led by Republican governors) are still trying to iron out
their intentions for the coming year, according to a decision-tracker from the
Kaiser Family Foundation.
- It's a nationwide debate that could linger for months and years, as
undecided states weigh a tempting influx of funds from the federal government
against state-borne costs down the road. Other states may revisit their
decisions in future years.
- The Affordable Care Act did not impose a strict deadline on states to say
whether they would accept the expansion of Medicaid and the new money that
comes with it.
- Seeking to get as much buy-in as possible, the Obama administration has
said it will allow states to opt in on a quarterly basis, since current
Medicaid law allows states to adjust their plans within that framework.
The open-ended debate contrasts with states' other big decision under
ObamaCare, which is whether to create state-based exchanges where uninsured
Americans can buy coverage, often with government subsidies.
- States could either set up the exchanges themselves or ask the federal
government do it for them, but they had to make their intentions known shortly
after the elections last November, because the exchanges are set to begin
enrollment on October 1.
- The federal government had expected most states to accept an expansion of
Medicaid until the Supreme Court ruled that states could reject the new part
without losing access to existing Medicaid money.
- That leaves states grappling with whether potential future budget
problems and possible federal strings outweigh the chance to have the federal
government pay for 100 percent of expansion through 2016 and 90 percent
through 2020.
Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have opted to expand their
programs, but 21 states have declined, citing opposition to ObamaCare, suspicion
of Washington's promises, and state costs down the road when the federal
government scales back its contribution to the program.
Source: Tom Howell, Jr., "Medicaid
Expansion Quandary," Washington Times, August 12, 2013.
Copyright © 2010 National Center for Policy Analysis. All rights
reserved.